FujiFilm T200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
FujiFilm T200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm T200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the FujiFilm T200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Pentax. The image resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the WG-3 GPS (16MP) is pretty comparable and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe T200 was manufactured 3 years before the WG-3 GPS and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the T200 matches up vs the WG-3 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm T200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix T200 and Pentax WG-3 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm T200 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| T200 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the FujiFilm T200
| WG-3 GPS | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 30 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| T200 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm T200 has outer dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm T200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the T200 and the WG-3 GPS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the T200 and WG-3 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The visual below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the T200 and WG-3 GPS.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Pentax WG-3 GPS to produce more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older T200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm T200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm T200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Pentax |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Also called as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 lb) | 238 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 240 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $160 | $350 |