FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh CX5
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Portability
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix T205
Ricoh CX5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the FujiFilm T200 versus Ricoh CX5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the T200 (14MP) and CX5 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe T200 was brought out 6 months before the CX5 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the T200 scores vs the CX5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Ricoh CX5. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Ricoh CX5
| T200 | CX5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the FujiFilm T200
| CX5 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Ricoh CX5
| T200 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | July 2011 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm T200 has exterior measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Ricoh CX5 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm T200 versus Ricoh CX5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the T200 and the CX5.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the T200 and CX5 is 94 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the T200 and CX5.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the FujiFilm T200 to render more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh CX5 Portrait photography advice
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes face detect focusing
manual focus not available
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
you can focus manually
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm T200
Street photography with Ricoh CX5
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Sports photography advice
Ricoh CX5 Sports photography advice
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes tracking focus
max fps very slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (180 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max fps low (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Travel photography factors
Ricoh CX5 Travel photography factors
decent megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
long zoom (280mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
not so great battery (180 per charge)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
lighter than average in class (205g)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh CX5 Landscape photography factors
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
small screen (2.7")
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
not so great battery (180 shots)
does not have Time Lapse function
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh CX5 Vlogging highlights
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic socket
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Ricoh CX5 |
| Also called | FinePix T205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $160 | $399 |