FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh G900
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
Photography Glossary FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the FujiFilm T200 versus Ricoh G900, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the T200 (14MP) and G900 (20MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe T200 was introduced 8 years prior to the G900 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the T200 matches up versus the G900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix T200 and Ricoh G900. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Ricoh G900
| T200 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the FujiFilm T200
| G900 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 | January 2011 | Newer by 86 months | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Ricoh G900
| T200 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The FujiFilm T200 features outer measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Ricoh G900 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm T200 versus Ricoh G900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the T200 and the G900.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the T200 and G900 is 94 and 89 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking a spec sheet. The picture below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the T200 and G900.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh G900 to give you more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged T200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Ricoh G900 |
| Also Known as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151g (0.33 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | 340 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $160 | $752 |