Clicky

FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
FujiFilm FinePix T200 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
  • 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2011
  • Additionally referred to as FinePix T205
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Lets take a closer look at the FujiFilm T200 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the T200 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the T200 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The T200 was released 8 months earlier than the GR Digital IV which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the T200 scores against the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 T200 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the FujiFilm T200

 GR Digital IV T200 
LaunchedSeptember 2011January 2011More recent by 8 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 T200 GR Digital IV 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The FujiFilm T200 enjoys outside measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

See the FujiFilm T200 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the T200 compared to the GR Digital IV.

FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the T200 and GR Digital IV is 94 and 92 respectively.

FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the T200 and GR Digital IV.

As you can see, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The T200 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the FujiFilm T200 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older T200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm T200 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography highlights
33
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
41
manual focus
saves RAW files
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

FujiFilm T200 Street photography details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography details
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with FujiFilm T200
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
37
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
max fps very slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (180 shots)
has no phase detect autofocus
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery (390 shots)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

FujiFilm T200 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
65
megapixel count good (14MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
long reach (280mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
bad battery pack (180 shots)
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
67
great battery (390 per charge)
built-in flash
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
resolution not great (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm T200 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography information
36
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
bad battery pack (180 shots)
does not have Time Lapse recording
53
manual focus
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
great battery (390 per charge)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm T200 Vlogging advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging advice
31
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
does not feature selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic jack
29
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone support
Photography Glossary

FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm T200 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 FujiFilm FinePix T200Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Company FujiFilm Ricoh
Model FujiFilm FinePix T200 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Also Known as FinePix T205 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2011-01-05 2011-09-15
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Highest boosted ISO 3200 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.4-5.6 f/1.9
Macro focus distance 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 2.60 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 151 grams (0.33 lb) 190 grams (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 images 390 images
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-45A DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD / SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail price $160 $599