FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c37d1/c37d125197bb9ae16c4bc2d2928d88a760ffef9c" alt="FujiFilm FinePix T200 front FujiFilm FinePix T200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0919f/0919f1115fdda8c239848792f287f46b2d1eed67" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front"
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very similar but the T200 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The T200 was brought out 15 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm T200 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the T200 grades vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
T200 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the FujiFilm T200
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | T200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
T200 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm T200 has exterior dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the T200 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0acd/a0acd6455ac158c6d3551387c1481d3bc4bcb9b2" alt="FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the T200 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 94 and 77 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4cc6/d4cc64bbcc35d73eec4748bc63bc15d778b7fe98" alt="FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The image here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the T200 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
All in all, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The T200 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the FujiFilm T200 will offer extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The newer T200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b44ea/b44eac53cde7e64fad8bc29a920df0c19f0804cb" alt="FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/258a9/258a9a885bf6f555652fcbc9fe8a6706198a0e9a" alt="FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Other name | FinePix T205 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 151 grams (0.33 pounds) | 453 grams (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $160 | $566 |