FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c37d1/c37d125197bb9ae16c4bc2d2928d88a760ffef9c" alt="FujiFilm FinePix T200 front FujiFilm FinePix T200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07dc5/07dc58b4a79864661a81726797271145ae172467" alt="Ricoh WG-6 front Ricoh WG-6 front"
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Below, we are looking at the FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the T200 (14MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The T200 was unveiled 8 years earlier than the WG-6 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the T200 scores against the WG-6 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Ricoh WG-6. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Ricoh WG-6
T200 | WG-6 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the FujiFilm T200
WG-6 | T200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 86 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Ricoh WG-6
T200 | WG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm T200 provides external measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-6 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the T200 vs the WG-6.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3c8d/f3c8d4d53949c995cfac3a73ac33f9bc3f672641" alt="FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 size comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the T200 and WG-6 is 94 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d895/5d8957d36120b1d7b3e8aaa2380aa58979469b09" alt="FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to see the difference in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The image underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the T200 and WG-6.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-6 to show greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged T200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a338a/a338adddd7e3600fa3ede59ac0e398bf91214b9f" alt="FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 sensor size comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7efc/a7efc9929e8fe950f107d1c4149db20bac0f67fc" alt="FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Ricoh WG-6 |
Also Known as | FinePix T205 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2018-02-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Flash on, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 151 grams (0.33 pounds) | 246 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 images | 340 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD / SDHC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $160 | $271 |