FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB35F
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the FujiFilm T200 and Samsung WB35F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively close and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe T200 was announced 4 years prior to the WB35F and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the T200 scores versus the WB35F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix T200 and Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Samsung WB35F
| T200 | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the FujiFilm T200
| WB35F | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 36 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Samsung WB35F
| T200 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The FujiFilm T200 has external measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm T200 and Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the T200 compared to the WB35F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the T200 and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The photograph below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the T200 and WB35F.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB35F to result in more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older T200 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Samsung WB35F |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $160 | $130 |
