FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB750
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Portability
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix T205
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Introduced September 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Let's look closer at the FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB750, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is relatively well matched and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe T200 was manufactured 7 months prior to the WB750 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the T200 matches up against the WB750 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Samsung WB750. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Samsung WB750
| T200 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the FujiFilm T200
| WB750 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2011 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Samsung WB750
| T200 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm T200 provides outside measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB750 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the T200 vs the WB750.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the T200 and WB750 is 94 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the T200 and WB750.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the FujiFilm T200 to resolve extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older T200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB750 Portrait photography information
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
offers face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
has manual focus
MP count decent (13MP)
offers face detection focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Street photography information
Samsung WB750 Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (193g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (180 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (13 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Travel photography features
Samsung WB750 Travel photography features
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great zoom (280mm)
no Time Lapse function
terrible battery (180 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
lighter than competition in class (193 grams)
MP count decent (13 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (432mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB750 Landscape photography info
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
terrible battery (180 shots)
no Time Lapse function
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (13 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Vlogging details
Samsung WB750 Vlogging details
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic jack
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (193g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm T200 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Samsung WB750 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 13MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $339 |