FujiFilm T200 vs Sony H90
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
FujiFilm T200 vs Sony H90 Key Specs
FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix T205
Sony H90
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 222g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Launched February 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm T200 vs Sony H90 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the FujiFilm T200 vs Sony H90, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the H90 (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe T200 was manufactured 13 months prior to the H90 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the T200 scores versus the H90 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing FujiFilm T200 vs Sony H90 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Sony H90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Sony H90
| T200 | H90 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony H90 over the FujiFilm T200
| H90 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Sony H90
| T200 | H90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
FujiFilm T200 vs Sony H90 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and volume. The FujiFilm T200 offers exterior measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Sony H90 has sizing of 105mm x 60mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm T200 vs Sony H90 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the T200 versus the H90.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the T200 and H90 is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Sony H90 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the T200 and H90.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Sony H90 to render greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The older T200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm T200 vs Sony H90 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with FujiFilm T200
Portrait photography with Sony H90
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm T200
Street photography with Sony H90
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (222g)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Sports photography camera
Sony H90 as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
max fps very slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (180 per charge)
no phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (24-384mm 16.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
provides tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Travel photography information
Sony H90 Travel photography information
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
terrible battery life (180 CIPA)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
lighter than competitors (222 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (384mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Landscape photography factors
Sony H90 Landscape photography factors
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
terrible battery life (180 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
pretty wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Vlogging highlights
Sony H90 Vlogging highlights
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic jack
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
lighter than competitors (222 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm T200 vs Sony H90 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 |
| Also referred to as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 3.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | 290 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $160 | $230 |
