FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus TG-320
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
FujiFilm T300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix T305
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the FujiFilm T300 versus Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the T300 (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe T300 was launched 5 months earlier than the TG-320 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the T300 scores against the TG-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix T300 & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are provided at FujiFilm T300 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T300 over the Olympus TG-320
| T300 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the FujiFilm T300
| TG-320 | T300 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm T300 and Olympus TG-320
| T300 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | January 2012 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm T300 offers exterior dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm T300 versus Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the T300 versus the TG-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the T300 and TG-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the T300 and TG-320.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution and you can expect similar quality of files though you have to factor the launch date of the products into consideration.
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm T300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
offers face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
FujiFilm T300 Street photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Street photography factors
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competition (155g)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
FujiFilm T300 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (180 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max fps low (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
FujiFilm T300 Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography factors
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
great zoom (280mm)
missing Time Lapse function
bad battery pack (180 per charge)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.4)
lighter than competition (155g)
environment sealing
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm T300 Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography details
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
bad battery pack (180 shots)
missing Time Lapse function
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
no Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with FujiFilm T300
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
slow max aperture (f3.4)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic port
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
lighter than competition (155 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Other name | FinePix T305 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 150 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $250 | $0 |