FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-320
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix T305
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the FujiFilm T300 versus Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the T300 (14MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe T300 was brought out at a similar time to the VR-320 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the T300 matches up against the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix T300 & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T300 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T300 over the Olympus VR-320
| T300 | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the FujiFilm T300
| VR-320 | T300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm T300 and Olympus VR-320
| T300 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 | July 2011 | Similar age | |
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The FujiFilm T300 features outside measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the FujiFilm T300 versus Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the T300 compared to the VR-320.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the T300 and VR-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at specs. The image here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the T300 and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same MP so you can expect similar quality of photographs however you need to consider the launch date of the products into consideration.
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix T305 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $250 | $179 |