FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-330
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
FujiFilm T300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Released July 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix T305
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the FujiFilm T300 versus Olympus VR-330, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the T300 (14MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty close and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe T300 was launched 6 months after the VR-330 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the T300 scores versus the VR-330 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix T300 and Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T300 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T300 over the Olympus VR-330
| T300 | VR-330 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the FujiFilm T300
| VR-330 | T300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T300 and Olympus VR-330
| T300 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | February 2011 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm T300 comes with external dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm T300 versus Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the T300 vs the VR-330.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the T300 and VR-330 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the T300 and VR-330.
As you can see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of files though you really should factor the production date of the cameras into account.
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm T300 Portrait photography features
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography features
MP count decent (14MP)
supports face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
decent MP (14MP)
provides face detection focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm T300
Street photography with Olympus VR-330
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
FujiFilm T300 Sports photography details
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography details
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
supports tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (180 shots)
does not have phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with FujiFilm T300
Travel photography with Olympus VR-330
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
no Time Lapse recording
bad battery pack (180 per charge)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
lighter than competition (158g)
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with FujiFilm T300
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-330
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
bad battery pack (180 CIPA)
no Time Lapse recording
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm T300 Vlogging info
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging info
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic jack
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
lighter than competition (158 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm T300 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Other name | FinePix T305 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $250 | $220 |