FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
![FujiFilm FinePix XP10 front FujiFilm FinePix XP10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-XP10/FujiFilm-XP10-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-80 front Ricoh WG-80 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-80/Ricoh-WG-80-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-180mm (F4.0-4.8) lens
- 135g - 96 x 64 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix XP11
- Updated by Fujifilm XP30
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-70
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Its time to look closer at the FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80, both Waterproof digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the XP10 (12MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The XP10 was brought out 13 years before the WG-80 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the XP10 grades versus the WG-80 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix XP10 & Ricoh WG-80. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm XP10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm XP10 over the Ricoh WG-80
XP10 | WG-80 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the FujiFilm XP10
WG-80 | XP10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2022 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 149 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the FujiFilm XP10 and Ricoh WG-80
XP10 | WG-80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.70" | Same display dimensions |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm XP10 has got outside dimensions of 96mm x 64mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the XP10 vs the WG-80.
![FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 size comparison FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-XP10-vs-Ricoh-WG-80-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XP10 and WG-80 is 95 and 91 respectively.
![FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-XP10-vs-Ricoh-WG-80-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The image underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XP10 and WG-80.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-80 to offer extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged XP10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 sensor size comparison FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-XP10-vs-Ricoh-WG-80-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-XP10-vs-Ricoh-WG-80-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm XP10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix XP10 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix XP10 | Ricoh WG-80 |
Also called as | FinePix XP11 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2022-05-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/4.0-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 9cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.70 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | On, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 135g (0.30 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 64 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-45A | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $175 | $300 |