FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak M320
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-180mm (F4.0-4.8) lens
- 124g - 91 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix Z71
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak M320 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the Z70 (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the Z70 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") possess totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Z70 was brought out 13 months after the M320 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short view of how the Z70 scores versus the M320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix Z70 & Kodak EasyShare M320. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm Z70 Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z70 over the Kodak M320
| Z70 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the FujiFilm Z70
| M320 | Z70 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z70 and Kodak M320
| Z70 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The FujiFilm Z70 has got outer dimensions of 91mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has specifications of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak M320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the Z70 compared to the M320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Z70 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The picture here should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z70 and M320.
To sum up, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Z70 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the FujiFilm Z70 will offer you extra detail having its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer Z70 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix Z70 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix Z70 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Also called as | FinePix Z71 | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/4.0-4.8 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 9cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 91 x 57 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $130 | $39 |
