FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
![FujiFilm FinePix Z70 front FujiFilm FinePix Z70 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z70/FujiFilm-Z70-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare Touch front Kodak EasyShare Touch front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-Touch/Kodak-Touch-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-180mm (F4.0-4.8) lens
- 124g - 91 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
- Other Name is FinePix Z71
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the FujiFilm Z70 versus Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Z70 (12MP) and the Touch (14MP) is fairly similar but the Z70 (1/2.3") and Touch (1/3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The Z70 was revealed 11 months prior to the Touch so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the Z70 matches up versus the Touch with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix Z70 and Kodak EasyShare Touch. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm Z70 Gallery and Kodak Touch Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z70 over the Kodak Touch
Z70 | Touch |
---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the FujiFilm Z70
Touch | Z70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 11 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm Z70 and Kodak Touch
Z70 | Touch | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm Z70 has got outer measurements of 91mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Kodak Touch has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm Z70 versus Kodak Touch in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Z70 and the Touch.
![FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch size comparison FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z70-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Touch-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Z70 and Touch is 96 and 95 respectively.
![FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z70-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Touch-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Z70 and Touch.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Z70 using its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Kodak Touch will offer greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged Z70 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
![FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z70-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Touch-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z70-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Touch-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z70 vs Kodak Touch Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix Z70 | Kodak EasyShare Touch | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix Z70 | Kodak EasyShare Touch |
Alternate name | FinePix Z71 | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2011-01-04 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/4.0-4.8 | - |
Macro focus distance | 9cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 7.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 150 gr (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 91 x 57 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-45A | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $130 | $100 |