FujiFilm Z70 vs Samsung ST93: A Thorough Comparison of Two Ultracompacts

When it comes to ultra-compact cameras from the early 2010s, the FujiFilm FinePix Z70 and Samsung ST93 stand out as intriguing options for enthusiasts looking for pocket-friendly, convenient shooters. Both models targeted casual users who needed a simple point-and-shoot with decent zoom and respectable image quality without stepping up to bulky DSLRs or mirrorless bodies. But which of these two should you consider if you want a camera that performs reliably for everyday use, travel, or casual photography today?

Having spent countless hours scrutinizing cameras in this category over the years, I’ve dug through specifications, tested real-world performance, and examined thoughtful user experiences to bring you a head-to-head comparison that goes well beyond spec sheets. I’ll touch on sensor tech, ergonomics, shooting versatility, image quality, and more to help you identify which ultra-compact might fit your photographic habits and budget.

Let’s get started.

Handling and Ergonomics: Which Feels Better in Your Hands?

First impressions count, especially with ultracompacts that you’re likely to carry around often. Both the FujiFilm Z70 and Samsung ST93 sport a small form factor with dimensions around 90 x 50-60 x 20 mm and weigh between 110g and 125g. The FujiFilm is slightly thicker and a touch heavier, but in my hand, that translates into a slightly more reassuring grip. Neither camera offers a dedicated grip or textured surfaces, but the FujiFilm’s slightly chunkier body helps with one-handed stability - something I value when shooting quickly on the move.

The Samsung edges slightly thinner and lighter, tipping the scales at 110g and sporting a slimmer profile. It will slide into pockets more easily and disappear into bags. However, that slimness also means less physical control - its buttons are smaller and more cramped on the back, which can hamper rapid access in my experience.

Looking at the control layout from above, the FujiFilm Z70 features a top-mounted shutter and zoom toggle with more tactile buttons, while the Samsung ST93’s top controls feel more minimalist and less distinct. This difference becomes evident when you try to adjust zoom or shoot rapidly - FujiFilm wins on ergonomics here.

Overall, if you prioritize ease of handling and intuitive physical controls in pocketable bodies, the FujiFilm Z70 is my preferred choice. The Samsung ST93 suits those who value size and lightness above all and can manage smaller controls without issue.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Experience

Both cameras rely on a 1/2.3” CCD sensor, reflecting the typical technology of the era. This sensor size is common in ultracompacts and defines much of the image quality ceiling you’ll face, especially regarding noise and dynamic range.

The FujiFilm Z70 offers a 12-megapixel resolution at 4000 x 3000 pixels. In contrast, the Samsung ST93 ups the ante slightly with 16 megapixels at 4608 x 3456 pixels. On paper, the Samsung’s higher pixel count suggests more detail capture, but pixel density also means smaller pixels, which often correlates with increased noise at higher ISOs.

Both models incorporate an anti-aliasing filter to reduce moiré and aliasing artifacts, standard fare for cameras of this type. Both camera sensors hover around an effective imaging area very close to 28 mm².

Reviewing raw technical tests and image samples - shot under controlled conditions - reveals the FujiFilm’s 12MP sensor benefits from slightly better noise control at ISO 800 and 1600, preserving more image detail in shadows and highlights thanks to its lower pixel density. The Samsung’s higher resolution sensor captures finer detail in good lighting but shows more noise and softness creeping in at above ISO 400.

Here’s a comparative visual of their sensor specs to consider:

My takeaway? If you want cleaner images in varied lighting without needing to fuss with post-processing noise reduction, FujiFilm’s Z70 has an edge in overall image quality for casual use. The Samsung ST93 excels when ample light is available and you crave additional megapixels for cropping or large prints, but expect more compromises in low light.

Screen and Interface: Your Window to the Scene

Ultracompacts typically have fixed rear LCDs to review images and compose shots. The FujiFilm Z70 showcases a 2.7-inch fixed LCD screen with a modest 230k-dot resolution - standard for its time but a bit coarse by modern standards. The Samsung ST93, meanwhile, offers a larger 3-inch LCD with almost double the resolution at 460k dots, translating into sharper image previews and menu text.

Neither camera features a touchscreen or articulating screen, which limits creative posture and quick interface navigation. Both lack electronic viewfinders too, so you’re fully reliant on the LCD, which may become challenging in bright sunlight.

Examining their rear screen layouts and viewing experience confirms these observations:

In real-world use, the Samsung’s higher resolution screen is more pleasant for reviewing photos and adjusting settings, particularly outdoors or for extended sessions. The FujiFilm’s screen is serviceable but feels dated in comparison.

Image Samples From Both Cameras: What You Can Expect

Sample imagery is where specs meet reality. I tested a wide variety of scenes - portrait sessions, landscapes, street shots, and more.

Here, side-by-side JPEG outputs reveal interesting traits:

• FujiFilm Z70 delivers pleasing skin tones with a natural warmth but tends to slightly soften edges, reducing micro-detail but increasing ally visual appeal in portraits.
• Samsung ST93 sharpens images robustly, giving punchier details but with a slight tendency to over-emphasize noise in shadow areas.
• Color reproduction on both is decent but FujiFilm’s color science feels more balanced and less “digital” compared to Samsung’s slightly cooler palette.
• At ISO 400 and below, both cameras produce clean, usable images. By ISO 800 and above, FujiFilm manages noise better, while Samsung’s images begin to degrade faster.

You can judge these points visually here:

FujiFilm Z70 front FujiFilm Z70 screen back Samsung ST93 front Samsung ST93 screen back

For everyday snapshots, FujiFilm’s output is more forgiving and user-friendly, appealing to casual shooters wanting decent results without post-production hassle. Samsung’s higher resolution and punchier images reward those willing to work a bit harder to tame noise.

Autofocus and Shooting Versatility: Speed Matters Sometimes

Neither camera offers dedicated manual focus control, AF tracking, nor face or eye detection autofocus features.

FujiFilm Z70 uses a contrast-detection AF system that supports single AF and tracking AF modes, though performance is basic - slow to lock in low light and struggles with dynamic subjects.

Samsung ST93 lacks contrast-detection AF - more surprisingly, it doesn’t even offer single AF control; instead, autofocus performance can feel sluggish and less reliable, especially in dim lighting.

Neither supports burst shooting or continuous AF, limiting their usefulness for wildlife, sports, or fast-paced photography.

Understandably, these ultracompacts prioritize ease of use over professional focus features.

Flash and Low-Light Performance: How They Light Your Shots

Both cameras incorporate built-in flashes but differ in flash control.

FujiFilm Z70 features a versatile flash with multiple modes: Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, and Slow Sync. Its flash range extends to 3.1 meters, adequate for typical indoor and casual night shots.

Samsung ST93’s flash is less customizable, with no clear info on modes or range, limiting control when lighting gets tricky.

Neither camera uses image stabilization, which can pose challenges in low-light conditions - expect motion blur if shutter speeds lag.

Low-light ISO performance essentially caps at ISO 1600 for FujiFilm and ISO 3200 for Samsung, though image quality at max ISO is generally noisy on both. I recommend shooting lower ISOs where possible.

Video Capabilities: Entry-Level and Simple

Video recording is basic on both.

FujiFilm Z70 supports 720p HD at 30 fps, recorded in Motion JPEG format, a less compressed and taxing codec but results in large file sizes. Lower resolutions and framerates (640x480 and 320x240 at 30fps) are also available. Microphone and headphone ports are absent.

Samsung ST93 offers 720p video, but codec details are vague. Again, no audio input/output capabilities.

Neither camera features image stabilization for video or advanced exposure controls during recording. For casual video clips, both suffice, but serious videographers will want to look elsewhere.

Durability and Build: Ready For Adventure?

Neither the FujiFilm Z70 nor the Samsung ST93 offers environmental sealing, weatherproofing, dustproofing, shockproofing, or freezeproofing. They are basic ultracompact cameras meant for careful everyday use.

If you anticipate rough environments, these aren’t the cameras you’ll reach for.

Battery Life and Storage: Plan Ahead

Neither manufacturer provides detailed battery life specs for these models, a common omission for older ultracompacts. Both rely on proprietary rechargeable lithium-ion batteries (FujiFilm uses NP-45A), and storage comes via single SD/SDHC card slots.

The FujiFilm Z70 connects via USB 2.0, whereas the Samsung ST93 oddly omits USB connectivity entirely, limiting file transfer options to card readers only.

Wireless features such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC are absent on both - no surprises given their vintage.

Price-to-Performance Ratio: Where Does Value Lie?

Upon launch, the FujiFilm Z70 sold for approximately $130. Samsung ST93’s price details are less clear but would have been in a similar budget ultracompact range.

Today, both models are available primarily on second-hand markets, often priced under $100.

Given FujiFilm’s stronger ergonomics, cleaner images at moderate ISOs, and broader flash control, it generally offers better bang for your buck if found at comparable prices.

Samsung ST93’s strengths lie in higher resolution images and a nicer rear screen but are held back by slower AF, restricted controls, and fewer connectivity options.

Photography Genres Suitability: Matching Features to Your Style

Let’s quickly review which camera suits key photography disciplines:

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Summing things up, the FujiFilm FinePix Z70 outperforms the Samsung ST93 for most casual and enthusiast photographers who want a balanced package. Its ergonomics, slightly better low-light images, flash versatility, and tactile controls make it a more enjoyable and practical daily shooter - even if it’s a little thicker.

On the other hand, Samsung’s ST93 may appeal if you prefer a very slim, light camera with a high-resolution screen and slightly higher megapixels - provided you’re shooting mostly in good light and can live with slower AF and limited connectivity.

If you’re shopping today and want an affordable ultracompact to slip in your bag for travel, street, or snapshot use, FujiFilm Z70’s timeless usability wins my vote. But if physical size and high-res photos top your list - bearing in mind the compromises - you might consider the Samsung ST93.

Either way, recognize that neither camera is a powerhouse nor built for pro-level control or performance. They’re relics of a simpler photographic time, but they shine in their modest aims to deliver point-and-shoot convenience with decent image quality. For enthusiasts on a tight budget or collectors interested in vintage ultra-compacts, they represent interesting entries.

I hope this detailed, hands-on comparison helps you weigh the options and find the ultracompact camera best suited to your needs, whether for casual snapshots, travel memories, or light creative explorations.

Feel free to ask if you want more focused advice for specific photographic genres or have questions about alternatives.

Happy shooting!