FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381
95 Imaging
35 Features
22 Overall
29
![FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR front FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z700EXR/FujiFilm-Z700EXR-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare M381 front Kodak EasyShare M381 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M381/Kodak-M381-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Other Name is FinePix Z707EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced July 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 Overview
Lets look more closely at the FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Z700EXR (12MP) and the M381 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the Z700EXR (1/2") and M381 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The Z700EXR was revealed 7 months later than the M381 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the Z700EXR grades vs the M381 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR & Kodak EasyShare M381. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm Z700EXR Gallery & Kodak M381 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z700EXR over the Kodak M381
Z700EXR | M381 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 7 months |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the FujiFilm Z700EXR
M381 | Z700EXR |
---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z700EXR and Kodak M381
Z700EXR | M381 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm Z700EXR has external dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Kodak M381 has measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the Z700EXR against the M381.
![FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 size comparison FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z700EXR-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M381-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z700EXR and M381 is 95 and 95 respectively.
![FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z700EXR-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M381-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at specs. The visual below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Z700EXR and M381.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The Z700EXR offers the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF easier. The fresher Z700EXR is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
![FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 sensor size comparison FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z700EXR-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M381-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z700EXR-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M381-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M381 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR | Kodak EasyShare M381 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR | Kodak EasyShare M381 |
Otherwise known as | FinePix Z707EXR | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2009-07-29 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/3.0-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 9cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m | 3.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 153g (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-45A | KLIC-7003 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $250 | $170 |