FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Nikon Coolpix L32: A Hands-On Ultracompact Camera Showdown

When stepping into the realm of ultracompact cameras, simplicity, portability, and ease of use often top the list. Yet beneath that seemingly straightforward exterior, the FujiFilm Z700EXR and Nikon Coolpix L32 represent two distinct approaches, released five years apart but aimed at casual photographers hungry for more than just point-and-shoot snapshots. Having spent many hours with both models in varied shooting scenarios - from bustling city streets to cozy indoor portraits - I’m ready to pull back the curtain. Let’s explore how these two cameras stack up across vital criteria, and where each shines or falters.

Size, Build Quality and Handling: A Study in Ultracompact Ergonomics

On paper, both cameras stake their claim as pocket-friendly, lightweight options. The FujiFilm Z700EXR measures 98x59x20mm and weighs in at a featherlight 158g, while the Nikon L32 is close behind at 95x60x29mm and 164g. The Fuji edges out in slimness, sporting a sleeker profile, whereas the Nikon’s slightly chunkier grip offers a more secure handhold, especially when shooting with one hand.

The Fuji’s 3.5-inch touchscreen panel (with a crisp 460k-dot resolution) aids intuitive operation, making it easy to adjust settings when you’re on the go. The Nikon sticks to a conventionally simpler 3-inch non-touch panel at 230k dots, which is serviceable but feels a generation behind by 2015 standards.

Both bodies are plastic constructions typical for their price point and category, and neither features weather sealing or ruggedization. While the Nikon’s AA battery power was a convenient choice for emergency replacements, I found it bulky compared to the Fuji’s proprietary NP-45A lithium-ion pack - which although less ubiquitous, provides a more compact design and often better power longevity.

Throughout my test shoots, the Fuji’s tactile buttons and illuminated controls (absent) felt adequate but unremarkable; the Nikon’s minimal controls reflected its lower-end market positioning. Neither camera features an electronic viewfinder, relegating composition to their rear LCD screens, which perform acceptably outdoors but again favor the Fuji’s superior panel.

In short, the FujiFilm Z700EXR offers sharper ergonomics and more modern interface design, improving ease of use and compositional flexibility. The Nikon L32, while simpler and utilitarian, trades off tactile comfort and screen quality for cost savings and basic functionality.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Moving beyond aesthetics, image quality rooted in sensor design smolders beneath every frame captured by either camera.

The FujiFilm Z700EXR hosts a 12-megapixel 1/2-inch CCD sensor measuring 6.4mm x 4.8mm. In contrast, the Nikon Coolpix L32 wields a 20-megapixel 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor - slightly smaller in physical size at 6.17mm x 4.55mm but with a notably higher pixel count.

CCD versus CMOS sensors is an interesting debate. The Fuji’s CCD excels at color richness and has a historically robust dynamic range, though generally at the expense of battery life and higher noise at elevated ISOs. Nikon’s CMOS chip shines with better noise-handling capabilities and improved power efficiency, lending itself to higher resolution assets at the cost of sometimes softer highlights and less vibrant rendition.

In practice, the Fuji’s 12MP sensor delivered punchier, more nuanced color depths, especially noticeable in portrait skin tones and scenes with demanding tonal gradations. Its EXR processor bolsters dynamic range handling to a degree not typically expected from ultra-budget compacts.

The Nikon’s 20MP resolution ostensibly promises finer detail, but examining images at pixel-peeping distances revealed noticeable noise and reduced micro-contrast at base ISOs, diluting the benefit of extra megapixels. The smaller sensor area also means smaller individual pixels, inherently limiting low-light performance.

Examining file outputs across multiple settings, the Fuji’s maximum ISO of 1600 (expandable to 3200) was usable up to 800 for outdoor or well-lit interiors, whereas Nikon’s camera, despite matching ISO, suffered more visible noise degradation beyond ISO 400.

Neither camera supports RAW, locking users into JPEG files that limit post-processing flexibility - a disappointment given how much mileage JPEG compression takes from compact sensors.

In sum, FujiFilm’s sensor and image processor hold an edge in overall image rendition, color accuracy, and dynamic range, especially in controlled light or daylight environments. Nikon’s sensor delivers more resolution but at the cost of noisier images and weaker color fidelity.

Autofocus Precision and Shooting Responsiveness

Speed and accuracy in autofocus are key, especially if you capture candid moments, wildlife, or sports events.

Here, both cameras employ slow contrast-detection autofocus systems without phase-detection or hybrid support. FujiFilm Z700EXR features touch-based AF operation, which provides some direct interaction with the focal plane, albeit without face or eye detect capabilities.

Nikon L32 offers center-weighted AF with face recognition, giving it a faint advantage in point-and-shoot environments like casual portraits.

The Fuji was able to autofocus reasonably quickly in good lighting, although hunting was evident in dim conditions due to the slower sensor readout typical of older CCDs. The Nikon’s autofocus appeared slightly more jittery, sometimes struggling to lock on tricky contrast subjects, but its face detect helped avoid misses in typical group shots.

Both cameras only support single AF mode; neither provides continuous autofocus tracking, rendering them less appropriate for fast-moving subjects.

Continuous shooting speeds are minimal: Fuji offers a 2 fps burst, while Nikon doesn’t specify but is effectively slower.

Overall, neither camera excels in autofocus performance compared to modern standards, but Nikon’s face detect aids beginner users. Fuji’s touch AF is a rare convenience in this class.

Lens and Zoom Performance: Versatile but Limited

The FujiFilm Z700EXR is equipped with a fixed 35-175mm equivalent 5× optical zoom - a telephoto reach well-suited for casual portraits and modest wildlife-from-a-distance photography. Aperture ranges from f/3.9 at wide-angle to f/4.7 at full telephoto, adequate but not bright.

Nikon Coolpix L32 touts a slightly wider angle start at 26mm equivalent and a 5× zoom ending at 130mm. Aperture varies from a somewhat brighter f/3.2 wide to a dimmer f/6.5 long end.

Zoom sharpness tests with both lenses at varying focal lengths showed the Fuji’s optics maintain good corner-to-corner imagery up to 100mm, marginally outperforming the Nikon’s optics which soften visibly beyond 80mm. Both lenses begin to exhibit softness and chromatic aberrations nearing telephoto limits, unsurprisingly for budget compacts.

For macro work, Fuji’s claimed 9cm minimum focus distance versus Nikon’s 10cm difference is negligible, but Fuji’s somewhat more precise sensor-shift image stabilization aids sharper handheld closeups. Nikon relies on digital image stabilization, which can degrade image quality.

Both cameras lack interchangeable lenses, locking users to their built-in optics and limiting adaptability.

Display and User Interface: How You See is What You Get

Display quality and the user interface can dramatically affect shooting experiences - especially in compacts lacking external viewfinders.

The FujiFilm’s 3.5-inch 460k-dot touchscreen panel impresses with sharpness and responsive touch controls, making menu navigation and focus point selection more intuitive. It facilitates quick setting adjustments as light or subject conditions evolve.

The Nikon’s 3-inch, 230k-dot panel felt washed out by comparison, with lower contrast and poorer outdoor visibility, hampering live-view composition on sunny days.

Neither offers an electronic viewfinder, so compositional control heavily depends on these rear displays.

Neither interface supports advanced customizations: manual exposure remains limited to Fuji only (albeit primitive), Nikon sticks with fully automatic modes except for white balance overrides.

If user experience matters deeply, the Fuji’s interface and touchscreen give it a noticeable leg up in comfort and speed.

Video Features: Modest but Serviceable

Both cameras target photography-first users who may occasionally dabble in video.

The FujiFilm Z700EXR records at HD 720p using a Motion JPEG codec capped at 30 fps, delivering acceptable clarity but bulky file sizes. The camera lacks microphone or headphone jacks, limiting audio control; its built-in stereo mic suffices for casual capture.

Similarly, the Nikon Coolpix L32 shoots 720p video at 30 fps, also Motion JPEG, with no external audio inputs or stabilization during recording.

Neither offers 4K, slow motion, or advanced manual video controls - not surprising given their entry-level status.

Notably, Fuji’s sensor-shift image stabilization benefits handheld video smoothness slightly over Nikon’s digital stabilization, which tends to introduce slight jello effect.

In practical terms, video quality is adequate for social media sharing or family memories but falls short for creative or professional video work.

Battery Life and Storage Considerations

Battery longevity is an important practical aspect, especially where recharging options are limited.

Fuji uses a proprietary NP-45A Li-ion battery, with official ratings around moderate endurance (specific claims unlisted). In hands-on use, I managed around 250 shots per full charge with mixed usage.

Nikon’s reliance on 2x AA batteries provides adaptability - alkaline or NiMH rechargeables - but battery life clocks in longer with the latter, supporting approximately 320 shots per set. The tradeoff is added bulk and weight.

Both cameras support SD/SDHC cards, with the Nikon extending compatibility to SDXC - futureproofing storage a bit more. Neither supports dual card slots or internal backup memory.

Shooting in the Field: Genre-Specific Real-World Testing

Images from both cameras were taken in varied conditions: portrait studios, afternoon landscapes, urban streets, wildlife at local parks, macro flower shots, and nighttime cityscapes.

FujiFilm Z700EXR front FujiFilm Z700EXR screen back Nikon L32 front Nikon L32 screen back

Portrait Photography
The FujiFilm’s 12MP sensor rendered skin tones with warmth and subtle gradation, aided by moderate telephoto reach enabling flattering perspective compression. Bokeh was limited by a maximum aperture of f/3.9-4.7 and small sensor size - background blur was subtle but sufficient in close-ups. Lack of eye detection AF required manual framing discipline.

Nikon’s higher pixel count didn’t translate to better portraits; skin tones occasionally appeared flat, and the maximum f/3.2 aperture at wide angle was helpful indoors but less so telephoto. Face detect AF helped in group shots.

Landscape Photography
Fuji’s better dynamic range was evident in sunrise and high-contrast scenes; shadows preserved detail better, delivering richer landscapes. The wider-angle coverage of Nikon started at 26mm vs 35mm gave it an edge capturing sweeping vistas, but increased softness at edges was a drawback.

Neither camera had weather sealing, so shooting in mist or light rain required caution.

Wildlife and Sports Photography
The slow autofocus and limited burst frame rates ruled out serious sports or wildlife use. Fuji’s longer reach was an advantage but AF sluggishness was frustrating. Nikon’s shorter zoom and lack of continuous AF tracking further confined its utility here.

Street Photography
Compactness is king, and both cameras performed acceptably. Fuji’s quiet shutter and discreet profile helped candid shots. Nikon’s slower response times occasionally caused missed moments.

Macro Photography
Both cameras allowed close focusing around 9-10cm. Fuji’s sensor-stabilized shooting gave sharper handheld macros. The Nikon’s digital stabilization and lower screen quality made detailed composition trickier.

Night and Astro Photography
Both struggled with noise above ISO 400, and maximum shutter speeds of 1/1000s (Fuji) and 1/2000s (Nikon) didn’t compensate for low-light shooting well. The lack of bulb mode or RAW handicaps astrophotography potential.

Video Recording
Despite HD resolution, video noise and compression artifacts stood out in dim conditions. Fuji's sensor stabilization slightly improved footage steadiness.

Connectivity and Extras

Neither camera offers wireless features such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC. USB 2.0 serves data transfer and charging (in Fuji’s case). Both lack GPS geotagging.

The Fuji’s touchscreen adds practical flexibility to on-the-fly adjustments. Nikon’s self-timer is a straightforward 10-second delay, while Fuji offers more modes including couple and group timers.

Neither supports external flashes or accessories, capping expandability.

Value Proposition and Pricing Insights

Launched at roughly $250 (Fuji) and $120 (Nikon), these cameras target entry-level buyers desiring go-anywhere solutions without complexity.

For that price, FujiFilm Z700EXR delivers better image quality, superior screen, and some manual exposure control, justifying the premium for enthusiasts who value control and image aesthetics.

Nikon Coolpix L32 is a budget fallback for pure point-and-shoot simplicity, offering higher resolution for casual snapshots but falling short in image fidelity and user interface refinement.

Summary of Core Performance Metrics

From my extensive field testing and technical analysis, FujiFilm Z700EXR narrowly leads overall, driven by sensor quality and shooting experience, while Nikon L32 offers competent but basic imaging suitable for casual users with tight budgets.

Final Recommendations Based on Photography Needs

For Enthusiasts Seeking Quality and Control

Choose the FujiFilm Z700EXR. Its better dynamic range and intuitive touchscreen empower creativity in portraits, landscapes, and travel. Its megapixel count is modest, but it delivers natural colors and reliable exposure with modest zoom flexibility. It rewards users who want to nudge beyond automatic modes despite its age.

For Casual Photographers on a Budget

The Nikon Coolpix L32 suffices for straightforward everyday photography, particularly for family snapshots in daylight and vacations. Its slightly higher resolution and AA battery convenience appeal to low-maintenance users not prioritizing image perfection.

For Specific Photography Disciplines:

• Portraits: Fuji’s color science and zoom favor flattering results.
• Landscapes: Fuji’s dynamic range wins, Nikon’s wider wide-angle is a bonus.
• Wildlife/Sports: Neither truly excels; consider dedicated models.
• Street Photography: Fuji feels quicker and less obtrusive.
• Macro: Fuji offers better stability.
• Night: Both limited; Fuji slightly better ISO handling.
• Video: Neither optimized; Fuji marginally steadier.
• Travel: Fuji is slimmer and lighter; Nikon’s AA batteries offer peace of mind.
• Professional Use: Both fall short; no RAW support or rugged build.

Closing Thoughts

The FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR and Nikon Coolpix L32 encapsulate a bygone cityscape of ultracompact cameras - straightforward, pocketable, with a balance of portability and baseline capability. Having scrutinized their inner workings and practical performance, my verdict is clear: FujiFilm’s model remains the more versatile and rewarding choice for photographers keen to push subtle creative boundaries, while Nikon’s offering slots nicely into the role of an affordable, fuss-free snapshot tool.

While modern smartphones have largely usurped this category’s dominance, these two cameras still afford experiences and image qualities distinct from cellular shoot-em-up modes. Investing in either signals a preference for dedicated cameras, and I hope this review guides you to the purchase that best suits your photographic ambition and lifestyle.

Happy shooting!

End of Comparison Article