FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Olympus 5010
95 Imaging
35 Features
22 Overall
29
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix Z707EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju 5010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Olympus 5010 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Olympus 5010, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Z700EXR (12MP) and the 5010 (14MP) is very well matched but the Z700EXR (1/2") and 5010 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z700EXR was brought out within a month of the 5010 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the Z700EXR grades versus the 5010 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Olympus 5010 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR and Olympus Stylus 5010. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm Z700EXR Gallery and Olympus 5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z700EXR over the Olympus 5010
| Z700EXR | 5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the FujiFilm Z700EXR
| 5010 | Z700EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z700EXR and Olympus 5010
| Z700EXR | 5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 |  | January 2010 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm Z700EXR features exterior dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus 5010 has measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Olympus 5010 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Z700EXR compared to the 5010.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z700EXR and 5010 is 95 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z700EXR and 5010.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Z700EXR because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus 5010 will resolve more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively.
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Olympus 5010 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR | Olympus Stylus 5010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR | Olympus Stylus 5010 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix Z707EXR | mju 5010 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 9cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 126 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45A | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $250 | $150 |