FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M320
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Also referred to as FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M320 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the FujiFilm Z800EXR versus Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Z800EXR (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the Z800EXR (1/2") and M320 (1/2.5") posses different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z800EXR was brought out 19 months after the M320 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short summation of how the Z800EXR scores versus the M320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR & Kodak EasyShare M320. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Kodak M320
| Z800EXR | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 19 months |
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
| M320 | Z800EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak M320
| Z800EXR | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The FujiFilm Z800EXR enjoys exterior dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm Z800EXR versus Kodak M320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the Z800EXR vs the M320.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Z800EXR and M320 is 95 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading technical specs. The pic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z800EXR and M320.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Z800EXR featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the FujiFilm Z800EXR will offer you greater detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer Z800EXR should have an edge in sensor tech.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Also Known as | FinePix Z808EXR | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-07-21 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 9cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $39 |