FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M340
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
96 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Released July 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M340 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak M340, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the Z800EXR (12MP) and the M340 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the Z800EXR (1/2") and M340 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Z800EXR was unveiled 19 months later than the M340 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the Z800EXR grades against the M340 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M340 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR and Kodak EasyShare M340. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery and Kodak M340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Kodak M340
| Z800EXR | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 19 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
| M340 | Z800EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak M340
| Z800EXR | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The FujiFilm Z800EXR has got physical dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Kodak M340 has specifications of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
See the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak M340 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Z800EXR compared to the M340.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Z800EXR and M340 is 95 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z800EXR and M340.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Z800EXR using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the FujiFilm Z800EXR will give extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher Z800EXR provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M340 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Kodak EasyShare M340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Kodak EasyShare M340 |
| Also called as | FinePix Z808EXR | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-07-21 | 2009-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3664 x 2748 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/3.1-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 9cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 115 grams (0.25 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $130 |