FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M380
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Also Known as FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M380 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak M380, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Z800EXR (12MP) and the M380 (10MP) is very well matched but the Z800EXR (1/2") and M380 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Z800EXR was introduced 19 months after the M380 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the Z800EXR grades against the M380 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M380 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR & Kodak EasyShare M380. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery & Kodak M380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Kodak M380
Z800EXR | M380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2010 | January 2009 | More modern by 19 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
M380 | Z800EXR |
---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak M380
Z800EXR | M380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M380 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm Z800EXR features physical measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Kodak M380 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak M380 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the Z800EXR against the M380.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z800EXR and M380 is 95 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M380 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The picture below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Z800EXR and M380.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Z800EXR with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the FujiFilm Z800EXR will give more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern Z800EXR is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M380 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M380 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Kodak EasyShare M380 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Kodak EasyShare M380 |
Also referred to as | FinePix Z808EXR | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-07-21 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 38-190mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 9cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1448 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m | 2.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-45A | KLIC-7003 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $200 | $160 |