FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9d3c/a9d3cc5042100f00925cb4722dafdb90b1666e82" alt="FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ded3/1ded3e1e0179a1da59d37bb7a9cb573d351b5faf" alt="Kodak EasyShare Touch front Kodak EasyShare Touch front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Also referred to as FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch Overview
On this page, we are matching up the FujiFilm Z800EXR versus Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Z800EXR (12MP) and the Touch (14MP) is fairly similar but the Z800EXR (1/2") and Touch (1/3") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The Z800EXR was brought out 5 months prior to the Touch and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Z800EXR scores versus the Touch with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR & Kodak EasyShare Touch. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery & Kodak Touch Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Kodak Touch
Z800EXR | Touch | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
Touch | Z800EXR |
---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak Touch
Z800EXR | Touch | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | ![]() | January 2011 | Similar age |
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm Z800EXR has physical dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Kodak Touch has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm Z800EXR versus Kodak Touch in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the Z800EXR vs the Touch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54cea/54cea45da1419a33a8adc84ef7749f8f43d3e37b" alt="FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch size comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Z800EXR and Touch is 95 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5ee4/b5ee42bf26043439074b39ef45f0a01bc23476ca" alt="FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The pic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Z800EXR and Touch.
To sum up, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Z800EXR because of its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Kodak Touch will offer greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9041/d9041ad8642cfdf19cb5e9fd431ca847bb6c7e9b" alt="FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6280/f628039d83ede2b17f363f43b91c4547fb805739" alt="FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Touch Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Kodak EasyShare Touch | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Kodak EasyShare Touch |
Also called as | FinePix Z808EXR | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-07-21 | 2011-01-04 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 17.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | - |
Macro focus distance | 9cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 7.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m | 3.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lb) | 150g (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-45A | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $200 | $100 |