FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900
95 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
![FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR/FujiFilm-Z800EXR-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S6900 front Nikon Coolpix S6900 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S6900/Nikon-S6900-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Released July 2010
- Additionally Known as FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 Overview
Lets look more closely at the FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Nikon. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Z800EXR (12MP) and S6900 (16MP) and the Z800EXR (1/2") and S6900 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The Z800EXR was announced 5 years before the S6900 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the Z800EXR grades versus the S6900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR and Nikon Coolpix S6900. The whole galleries are provided at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery and Nikon S6900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Nikon S6900
Z800EXR | S6900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
S6900 | Z800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 55 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Nikon S6900
Z800EXR | S6900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same screen resolution |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The FujiFilm Z800EXR has external measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Nikon S6900 has specifications of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the Z800EXR vs the S6900.
![FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 size comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6900-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Z800EXR and S6900 is 95 and 93 respectively.
![FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6900-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specifications. The picture underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Z800EXR and S6900.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Z800EXR with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Nikon S6900 will resolve extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged Z800EXR is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
![FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 sensor size comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6900-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6900-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Nikon S6900 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Nikon Coolpix S6900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Nikon Coolpix S6900 |
Other name | FinePix Z808EXR | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-07-21 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/3.3-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 9cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m | 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 181 grams (0.40 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 180 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-45A | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $200 | $190 |