FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9d3c/a9d3cc5042100f00925cb4722dafdb90b1666e82" alt="FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d855c/d855c4cbe7d9d28e98143d16fe9df7ae12246ddd" alt="Samsung CL5 front Samsung CL5 front"
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Other Name is FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Samsung CL5, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the Z800EXR (12MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the Z800EXR (1/2") and CL5 (1/2.5") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The Z800EXR was introduced 18 months later than the CL5 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Z800EXR matches up against the CL5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR and Samsung CL5. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Samsung CL5
Z800EXR | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Display sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
CL5 | Z800EXR |
---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Samsung CL5
Z800EXR | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm Z800EXR provides external dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung CL5 has measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Samsung CL5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the Z800EXR versus the CL5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cb11/6cb115e5b4dbb469b019b1ddc47207dbc5da8503" alt="FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 size comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Z800EXR and CL5 is 95 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e1df/2e1df1809085374d00b54e71871dbf1e42c77bee" alt="FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z800EXR and CL5.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Z800EXR with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the FujiFilm Z800EXR will resolve extra detail using its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer Z800EXR is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb1cf/bb1cf5cef57258e877b36236d9598fe24a2d8f7a" alt="FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f6e/87f6ee4442cbc1ec97e463027e98602d3374d6e8" alt="FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung CL5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung CL5 |
Other name | FinePix Z808EXR | PL10 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-07-21 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/3.5-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 9cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 141 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $200 | $391 |