FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL80
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5500
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL80, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Z800EXR (12MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is very close but the Z800EXR (1/2") and CL80 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Z800EXR was brought out 7 months after the CL80 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the Z800EXR scores against the CL80 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR & Samsung CL80. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Samsung CL80
| Z800EXR | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 7 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
| CL80 | Z800EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.7" |  | 3.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Samsung CL80
| Z800EXR | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm Z800EXR provides exterior dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung CL80 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL80 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the Z800EXR vs the CL80.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z800EXR and CL80 is 95 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by researching technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z800EXR and CL80.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Z800EXR due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung CL80 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The younger Z800EXR will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung CL80 |
| Also Known as | FinePix Z808EXR | ST5500 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-07-21 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 9cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $200 | $400 |