FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620
95 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
![FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR/FujiFilm-Z800EXR-front.jpg)
![Samsung SL620 front Samsung SL620 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-SL620/Samsung-SL620-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL65
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Z800EXR (12MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is very comparable but the Z800EXR (1/2") and SL620 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The Z800EXR was revealed 18 months later than the SL620 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Z800EXR grades vs the SL620 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR and Samsung SL620. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Samsung SL620
Z800EXR | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 18 months |
Display dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
SL620 | Z800EXR |
---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Samsung SL620
Z800EXR | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm Z800EXR enjoys outside measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the Z800EXR and the SL620.
![FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 size comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR-vs-Samsung-SL620-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z800EXR and SL620 is 95 and 94 respectively.
![FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR-vs-Samsung-SL620-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z800EXR and SL620.
As you can see, both the cameras have got the exact same megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The Z800EXR comes with the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult. The newer Z800EXR will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
![FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR-vs-Samsung-SL620-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR-vs-Samsung-SL620-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung SL620 |
Alternative name | FinePix Z808EXR | PL65 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-07-21 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 9cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $200 | $200 |