FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL240
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched July 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Z800EXR (12MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is relatively close but the Z800EXR (1/2") and TL240 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe Z800EXR was revealed 7 months later than the TL240 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the Z800EXR grades versus the TL240 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR & Samsung TL240. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Samsung TL240
| Z800EXR | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2010 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 7 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
| TL240 | Z800EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Samsung TL240
| Z800EXR | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3.5" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm Z800EXR comes with outer dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL240 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the Z800EXR against the TL240.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Z800EXR and TL240 is 95 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z800EXR and TL240.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Z800EXR having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung TL240 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher Z800EXR provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung TL240 |
| Also called as | FinePix Z808EXR | ST5000 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-07-21 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 9cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $200 | $171 |