FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Sony T900
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
95 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
Portability
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Sony T900 Key Specs
FujiFilm Z800EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced July 2010
- Also Known as FinePix Z808EXR
Sony T900
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Sony T900 Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Sony T900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Z800EXR (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly similar but the Z800EXR (1/2") and T900 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Z800EXR was unveiled 18 months after the T900 making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Z800EXR grades vs the T900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Sony T900
| Z800EXR | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
| T900 | Z800EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Sony T900
| Z800EXR | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3.5" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm Z800EXR has got outside measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the Z800EXR vs the T900.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Z800EXR and T900 is 95 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z800EXR and T900.
Clearly, the 2 cameras come with the identical MP but not the same sensor sizes. The Z800EXR provides the larger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh easier. The more recent Z800EXR will have an advantage in sensor tech.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR Portrait photography features
Sony T900 Portrait photography features
no manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2")
does not have RAW files
has manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm Z800EXR
Street photography with Sony T900
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than competitors (158g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR Sports photography details
Sony T900 Sports photography details
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000s)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2")
does not have phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,000s)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Travel photography with FujiFilm Z800EXR
Travel photography with Sony T900
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (158g)
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR Landscape photography advice
Sony T900 Landscape photography advice
bigger than average screen (3.5 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual exposure
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2")
does not have RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
has manual focus
lovely big screen (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR Vlogging info
Sony T900 Vlogging info
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (158 grams)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Sony T900 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix Z808EXR | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-07-21 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 9cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 143 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $300 |
