Clicky

Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Fujifilm FinePix A100 front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34

Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Fujifilm A100
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 92 x 61 x 22mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm A100 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm A100 was announced 23 months prior to the TG-310 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm A100 matches up versus the TG-310 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Fujifilm A100 over the Olympus TG-310

          

          

            
 Fujifilm A100 TG-310 
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Fujifilm A100

          

          

            
 TG-310 Fujifilm A100 
IntroducedJanuary 2011February 2009Fresher by 23 months
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Fujifilm A100 and Olympus TG-310

          

          

            
 Fujifilm A100 TG-310 
Manual focus  No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal display measurement
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen  Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Neither provides Touch friendly display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm A100 provides exterior dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm A100 vs the TG-310.
Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm A100 and TG-310 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Quite often, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The photograph below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm A100 and TG-310.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-310 to result in greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm A100 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

            Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm A100 Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography details
19
 manual focus not available
 manual exposure not possible
 external flash not possible
 low megapixels (10 megapixels)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
33
 decent sensor resolution (14MP)
 comes with face detect focusing
 lack of manual focus
 manual exposure not possible
 can't use external flash
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
Photography Glossary
Street Comparison
Fujifilm A100 Street photography information
Olympus TG-310 Street photography information
54
 lighter than competition in class (124g)
 no articulating screen
 does not have image stabilization
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
66
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sports Comparison
 Fujifilm A100 as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus TG-310 as a Sports photography camera
16
 no shutter priority mode
 does not have image stabilization
 low megapixels (10MP)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect AF
40
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (14MP)
 comes with tracking focus
 weather proof
 max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 bad battery (150 per charge)
 does not have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
 Fujifilm A100 as a Travel photography camera
 Olympus TG-310 as a Travel photography camera
55
 lighter than competition in class (124 grams)
 has built in flash
 does not have Timelapse recording
 low megapixels (10 megapixels)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 wide angle not great (36mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
67
 lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
 weather proof
 decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 pretty wide (28mm)
 missing Time Lapse mode
 bad battery (150 CIPA)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm A100 Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography factors
22
 manual focus not available
 cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not great (36mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
 screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
 manual exposure not possible
 does not have image stabilization
 low megapixels (10MP)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
 does not have Timelapse recording
39
 pretty wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
 weather proof
 lack of manual focus
 cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
 screen is small (2.7 inches)
 manual exposure not possible
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
 bad battery (150 CIPA)
 missing Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm A100 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-310 Vlogging details
25
 lighter than competition in class (124g)
 wide angle not great (36mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 does not have image stabilization
 video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
 does not have microphone jack
32
 pretty wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detect focusing
 lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 missing mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
        
                
        

          

            
Fujifilm A100 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm A100 and Olympus TG-310
 Fujifilm FinePix A100Olympus TG-310
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix A100 Olympus TG-310
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2009-02-04 2011-01-06
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3 and  3:2 -
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Touch to focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus distance 5cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 3.90 m 4.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 124 grams (0.27 lbs) 155 grams (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 92 x 61 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $0 $0