Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
![Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR/Fujifilm-F200EXR-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix P310 front Nikon Coolpix P310 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-P310/Nikon-P310-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 194g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Launched June 2012
- Older Model is Nikon P300
- Newer Model is Nikon P330
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Nikon P310, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Nikon. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and P310 (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and P310 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm F200EXR was released 4 years prior to the P310 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades versus the P310 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Nikon Coolpix P310. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Nikon P310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Nikon P310
Fujifilm F200EXR | P310 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P310 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
P310 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2012 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 38 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Nikon P310
Fujifilm F200EXR | P310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR enjoys exterior measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Nikon P310 has proportions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Nikon P310 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the P310.
![Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 size comparison Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P310-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and P310 is 93 and 92 respectively.
![Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P310-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading technical specs. The visual below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and P310.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F200EXR featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Nikon P310 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
![Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 sensor size comparison Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P310-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P310-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon P310 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Nikon Coolpix P310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Nikon Coolpix P310 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-04-30 | 2012-06-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-100mm (4.2x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $350 | $700 |