Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S800c
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
93 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S800c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Introduced February 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S800c Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Nikon S800c, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Nikon. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and S800c (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and S800c (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm F200EXR was introduced 4 years prior to the S800c which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores vs the S800c with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S800c Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Nikon Coolpix S800c. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Nikon S800c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Nikon S800c
| Fujifilm F200EXR | S800c |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| S800c | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2013 | April 2009 | Newer by 45 months | |
| Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 819k | 230k | Crisper display (+589k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Nikon S800c
| Fujifilm F200EXR | S800c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S800c Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides outside measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Nikon S800c has measurements of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Nikon S800c in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR against the S800c.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and S800c is 93 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S800c Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through technical specs. The image underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and S800c.
As you can tell, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Nikon S800c will give extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S800c Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S800c Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Nikon Coolpix S800c | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Nikon Coolpix S800c |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-04-30 | 2013-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 819k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 184 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 140 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $350 | $290 |