Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9900
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Released February 2015
- Succeeded the Nikon S9700
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9900 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm F200EXR and Nikon S9900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Nikon. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and S9900 (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and S9900 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe Fujifilm F200EXR was manufactured 6 years before the S9900 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up against the S9900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Nikon Coolpix S9900. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Nikon S9900
Fujifilm F200EXR | S9900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
S9900 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | April 2009 | Fresher by 70 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Nikon S9900
Fujifilm F200EXR | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR offers outer measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Nikon S9900 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F200EXR and Nikon S9900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and the S9900.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and S9900 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and S9900.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F200EXR because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Nikon S9900 will offer you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-04-30 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 289g (0.64 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $350 | $300 |