Clicky

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
24
Overall
30
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
 
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
36
Features
35
Overall
35

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Revealed April 2009
Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Introduced February 2010
  • Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus SP-800 UZ, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm F200EXR was announced 9 months before the SP-800 UZ so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up vs the SP-800 UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm F200EXR SP-800 UZ 

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm F200EXR

 SP-800 UZ Fujifilm F200EXR 
IntroducedFebruary 2010April 2009More modern by 9 months

Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm F200EXR SP-800 UZ 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm F200EXR has got outside measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus SP-800 UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR against the SP-800 UZ.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and SP-800 UZ is 93 and 69 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The pic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F200EXR and SP-800 UZ.

All in all, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will produce more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Portrait photography highlights
Olympus SP-800 UZ Portrait photography highlights
21
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.6")
does not have RAW files
28
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
Street photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/1.6")
does not have RAW files
46
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Sports photography camera
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.6")
does not have phase detect auto focus
46
excellent zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
comes with tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Travel photography advice
Olympus SP-800 UZ Travel photography advice
57
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.3)
61
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
very long zoom (840mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Landscape photography info
Olympus SP-800 UZ Landscape photography info
38
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.6")
does not have RAW files
no Time Lapse function
41
really wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Vlogging features
Olympus SP-800 UZ Vlogging features
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic socket
24
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus SP-800 UZ
 Fujifilm FinePix F200EXROlympus SP-800 UZ
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Olympus SP-800 UZ
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-04-30 2010-02-02
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8 x 6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 48.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 1000
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 143
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-840mm (30.0x)
Max aperture f/3.3-5.1 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 12 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1500 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.30 m (Auto ISO) 3.10 m
Flash settings Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205 gr (0.45 lbs) 455 gr (1.00 lbs)
Dimensions 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-50 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $350 $270