Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30


69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed April 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus SP-800 UZ, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

The Fujifilm F200EXR was announced 9 months before the SP-800 UZ so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up vs the SP-800 UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Fujifilm F200EXR | SP-800 UZ |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm F200EXR
SP-800 UZ | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2010 | ![]() | April 2009 | More modern by 9 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus SP-800 UZ
Fujifilm F200EXR | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm F200EXR has got outside measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus SP-800 UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR against the SP-800 UZ.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and SP-800 UZ is 93 and 69 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The pic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F200EXR and SP-800 UZ.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will produce more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-04-30 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 12 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 455 gr (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $350 | $270 |