Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus 6000
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Olympus 6000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and 6000 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm F200EXR was released 2 months prior to the 6000 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores versus the 6000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus 6000
| Fujifilm F200EXR | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| 6000 | Fujifilm F200EXR |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus 6000
| Fujifilm F200EXR | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2009 |  | July 2009 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR features external dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6000 has proportions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Olympus 6000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR against the 6000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and 6000 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and 6000.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F200EXR due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm F200EXR will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a little more aggressively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Also Known as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-04-30 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 179 gr (0.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $350 | $259 |