Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-10
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and XZ-10 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F200EXR was revealed 4 years earlier than the XZ-10 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades against the XZ-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus XZ-10
| Fujifilm F200EXR | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| XZ-10 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | April 2009 | Newer by 45 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus XZ-10
| Fujifilm F200EXR | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR enjoys physical dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Olympus XZ-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR against the XZ-10.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and XZ-10 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and XZ-10.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have the same MP but not the same sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR comes with the larger sensor which should make getting shallower DOF simpler. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-04-30 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $428 |