Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-310
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
Photography Glossary Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-310, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and TG-310 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm F200EXR was manufactured 20 months before the TG-310 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up vs the TG-310 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus TG-310
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| TG-310 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | April 2009 | Newer by 20 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-310
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR has got exterior dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-310 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the TG-310.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-310 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-310.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-310 will show greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus TG-310 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-04-30 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $350 | $0 |