Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-610
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Released January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-610, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the TG-610 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and TG-610 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm F200EXR was revealed 20 months before the TG-610 making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores against the TG-610 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Olympus TG-610. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus TG-610
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-610 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| TG-610 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | April 2009 | Newer by 20 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-610
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F200EXR features physical dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-610 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-610 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and the TG-610.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-610 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-610.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-610 will provide greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus TG-610 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus TG-610 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-04-30 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 210 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $223 |