Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-810
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched August 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-810, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is very well matched but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and TG-810 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm F200EXR was brought out 3 years earlier than the TG-810 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores versus the TG-810 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Olympus TG-810. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus TG-810
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-810 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| TG-810 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 |  | April 2009 | More recent by 27 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-810
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F200EXR offers outer dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-810 has measurements of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-810 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the TG-810.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-810 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through technical specs. The visual here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-810.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-810 will give greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus TG-810 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-04-30 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 215g (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $350 | $428 |