Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-1 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F200EXR was announced 4 years before the TG-1 iHS and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades vs the TG-1 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| TG-1 iHS | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 |  | April 2009 | More recent by 36 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR has got external measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has proportions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-1 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR against the TG-1 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-1 iHS is 93 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The photograph here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-1 iHS.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR features the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field simpler. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-04-30 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $350 | $399 |