Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-3
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- New Model is Olympus TG-4
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and TG-3 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm F200EXR was brought out 5 years earlier than the TG-3 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up against the TG-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Olympus Tough TG-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus TG-3
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| TG-3 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 59 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-3
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F200EXR has outer dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus the TG-3.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-3 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through specifications. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-3.
Plainly, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-3 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-04-30 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $350 |