Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VG-160
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and VG-160 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm F200EXR was manufactured 3 years prior to the VG-160 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades against the VG-160 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Olympus VG-160. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus VG-160
| Fujifilm F200EXR | VG-160 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| VG-160 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | April 2009 | Fresher by 32 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus VG-160
| Fujifilm F200EXR | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides outside measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Olympus VG-160 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the VG-160.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and VG-160 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at specs. The visual below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F200EXR and VG-160.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F200EXR due to its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus VG-160 will give more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus VG-160 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-04-30 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $90 |