Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VH-515
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Olympus VH-515, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the VH-515 (12MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and VH-515 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm F200EXR was released 4 years earlier than the VH-515 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades vs the VH-515 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Olympus VH-515. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus VH-515
| Fujifilm F200EXR | VH-515 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| VH-515 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 40 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus VH-515
| Fujifilm F200EXR | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F200EXR enjoys outer dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus VH-515 has measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Olympus VH-515 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR against the VH-515.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and VH-515 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over specifications. The picture underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F200EXR and VH-515.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides the larger sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus VH-515 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus VH-515 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-04-30 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $350 | $648 |
