Clicky

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
24
Overall
30
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Launched April 2009
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Here, we are looking at the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus VR-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and VR-320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm F200EXR was introduced 3 years prior to the VR-320 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up versus the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm F200EXR VR-320 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm F200EXR

 VR-320 Fujifilm F200EXR 
ReleasedJuly 2011April 2009Fresher by 27 months

Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm F200EXR VR-320 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR offers external measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and the VR-320.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and VR-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and VR-320.

As you can see, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F200EXR with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will give you more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
21
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.6")
has no RAW files
33
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/1.6")
has no RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Sports photography details
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography details
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.6")
has no phase detect autofocus
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
offers tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
57
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
70
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
no Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Landscape photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography advice
38
reasonably wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.6")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
42
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Vlogging details
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging details
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic jack
32
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm FinePix F200EXROlympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Olympus VR-320
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-04-30 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8 x 6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 48.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 12800 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Largest aperture f/3.3-5.1 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1500 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.30 m (Auto ISO) 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205 grams (0.45 lb) 158 grams (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-50 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Launch cost $350 $179