Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus VR-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and VR-320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm F200EXR was introduced 3 years prior to the VR-320 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up versus the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm F200EXR | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| VR-320 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 | April 2009 | Fresher by 27 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm F200EXR | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR offers external measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and the VR-320.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and VR-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and VR-320.
As you can see, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F200EXR with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will give you more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-04-30 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $350 | $179 |