Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-340
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
96 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and VR-340 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm F200EXR was released 3 years prior to the VR-340 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores versus the VR-340 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Olympus VR-340. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus VR-340
| Fujifilm F200EXR | VR-340 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| VR-340 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 32 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus VR-340
| Fujifilm F200EXR | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR comes with external measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus VR-340 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to the VR-340.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and VR-340 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and VR-340.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus VR-340 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus VR-340 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-04-30 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $130 |