Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-1
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") provide different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm F200EXR was manufactured 21 months prior to the XZ-1 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up against the XZ-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus XZ-1
| Fujifilm F200EXR | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| XZ-1 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | April 2009 | Newer by 21 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus XZ-1
| Fujifilm F200EXR | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR has got outside measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus the XZ-1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and XZ-1 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F200EXR and XZ-1.
Clearly, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm F200EXR will give you greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-04-30 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 275 gr (0.61 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $567 |