Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX1
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed April 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and CX1 (9MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and CX1 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm F200EXR was unveiled 3 months after the CX1 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores vs the CX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Ricoh CX1. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh CX1
| Fujifilm F200EXR | CX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| CX1 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh CX1
| Fujifilm F200EXR | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2009 |  | February 2009 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR features external dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR against the CX1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and CX1 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The picture below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and CX1.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR with its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Fujifilm F200EXR will offer extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh CX1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-04-30 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 180 gr (0.40 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $299 |
