Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX4
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh CX4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and CX4 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm F200EXR was launched 15 months prior to the CX4 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up vs the CX4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh CX4
| Fujifilm F200EXR | CX4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| CX4 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2010 |  | April 2009 | Fresher by 15 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh CX4
| Fujifilm F200EXR | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm F200EXR has outer dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh CX4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the CX4.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and CX4 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The graphic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F200EXR and CX4.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F200EXR due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm F200EXR will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh CX4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-04-30 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 205 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $350 | $211 |