Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX5
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed April 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh CX5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the CX5 (10MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and CX5 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F200EXR was revealed 3 years prior to the CX5 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades versus the CX5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Ricoh CX5. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh CX5
| Fujifilm F200EXR | CX5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| CX5 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 27 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh CX5
| Fujifilm F200EXR | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F200EXR enjoys physical dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX5 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh CX5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the CX5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and CX5 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F200EXR and CX5.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm F200EXR will offer you more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh CX5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-04-30 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $350 | $399 |