Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed April 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Lets look closer at the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is fairly similar but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm F200EXR was introduced 3 years prior to the GR Digital IV and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up versus the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm F200EXR | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Fujifilm F200EXR
GR Digital IV | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | April 2009 | Fresher by 28 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm F200EXR | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides physical measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the GR Digital IV.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and GR Digital IV is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F200EXR and GR Digital IV.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F200EXR having a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm F200EXR will deliver greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-04-30 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $350 | $599 |