Clicky

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Revealed April 2009
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Lets look closer at the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is fairly similar but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm F200EXR was introduced 3 years prior to the GR Digital IV and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up versus the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 Fujifilm F200EXR GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Fujifilm F200EXR

 GR Digital IV Fujifilm F200EXR 
RevealedSeptember 2011April 2009Fresher by 28 months
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 Fujifilm F200EXR GR Digital IV 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides physical measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Contrast the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the GR Digital IV.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and GR Digital IV is 93 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F200EXR and GR Digital IV.

As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F200EXR having a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm F200EXR will deliver greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Portrait photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography info
21
manual focus not available
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
does not have RAW support
41
has manual focus
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
does not have RAW support
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Sports photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography info
28
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
does not have phase detect autofocus
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery (390 shots)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Travel photography details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography details
57
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
67
better than average battery (390 shots)
built-in flash
great max aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
38
rather wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
53
has manual focus
great max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (390 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Vlogging factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging factors
28
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone socket
29
great max aperture (f1.9)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Fujifilm FinePix F200EXRRicoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Ricoh
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Ricoh GR Digital IV
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-04-30 2011-09-15
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 8 x 6mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 48.0mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.3-5.1 f/1.9
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1500 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.30 m (Auto ISO) 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205g (0.45 pounds) 190g (0.42 pounds)
Physical dimensions 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50 DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $350 $599